LOW IMPACT TECHNOLOGY VS SUPER HIGH IMPACT TECHNOLOGY ( L.I.T. vs S.H.I.T.)

For anyone who is intersted in the technologies of the future we need to define what exactly they are and they mean. 

When we talk about LIT we talk about low imapct technology - industries that have very little or almost no impact on the biome or the Equlibrium of Planet Earth.

 This is our general aim as a species....

TO SURVIVE!! 

TO THRIVE.!!

TO STAY ALIVE!!

SINGLE USE PLASTICS - that contains only water inside .  (S.H.I.T) takes 450 to 1000 years ro buodegrade whereas hemp plastic is only 6 to 9 months ( L.I.T)...

Thats the crux of the matter . 

 However, with the current economic system we are focussing and have focussed in the last 250 years on HIGH impact technology that uses resources that took thousands if not millions of years to create. For example... OIL -

- oil is generally plant and animal based and was created over time and pressure and supplants the entire Earths crust.

 If we wish to raise the surface temperatures and acidify the oceans as we are doing... we need to BURN these HIT items that include OIL- COAL- GAS- and WOOD.

 Even methane is not clean. It degrades into CO22 and is more dangerous as a Green House Gas - GHG and creates a more devasting effect on the Equilibrium.

Humans account for around 23% of methane disposal...but as the temperatures rise... methane hiding in ice caps in the north and south poles... sequestrated... are then released into the air ...

- so it is indirectly caused by HIT. Furthermore... the meat industry is a HIT... and then there are SUPER HIGH IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES... we call them ... you guessed it.. SHIT - 

-OIL... is SHIT. and on the opposite side of the spectrum we have GEOTHERMAL which is SUPER LOW TECHNOLOGY - SLIT.

 Our aim as a species is not to go carbon zero... it is to go CARBON NEGATIVE.

 But for that to happen we need to transforms- TRANS into LIT and SLIT. Solar power - wind power is LIT. 

Because it still requires the panels and the mills to be made in factories and has a short life span of 15 years or so.

 Sometimes less and sometimes more.. NUCLEAR energy is not LIT but MIT " Middle Impact Technology...

 " Its somewhat clean... but its waste is the hardest thing to deal with. Perhaps in future it could be reduced to LIT if its waste material were depositied into space by MR. Musk & Co.

 - I am sure the Chinese are already considering factories that pollute enourmously and dangerous tek - "SHIT.".. like FUSION more safer to be tested and built in this environment - so as not to have a high impact on Earth in the event it goes...BOOM!-

 So this leaves us with things that do not pollute or endanger the Earth to such a degree that it threatens all life. 

This NEW economic system is based on 8 algorithms and we call it... ENVIRONOMISM.

I coined the terminology way back in 1992 after my first visit to INPA - Institute National Pescades de Amazonas.. in Manaus in Brazil just after the Rio Earth Summit - which talked about AGENDA 21...

 still a pipe dream... the COP summit in Madrid I attended in 2019 and found it to be more primitive and another exclusive club that is not talking about AGENDA 2030.

Carl Sagan was talking about the greenhouse effect way back in 1985. So was Al Gore...( actually he was listening ) - people all knew about the problems 40 years ago. 

But what have they actually done about the GHG problem?..the green new deal ???

Not a hellava lot... we had pseudo scientists like Allan Savoury telling us to use cows to stop desertification..

 - it works to some degree because you spread animal droppings around on the soil and the soil needs 3% plant and animal matter to remain soil... in dubai i saw the lecture of sad giru who was on his motor bike from london to bombay ( mumbai ) trying to say.  we need to save our soil.. but he didnt really say how... certainly incresing the compost is one way.. but how ? - definitely not wity dr savourys methods.   that most certainly ISNT the solution to saving our soil... 

OR saving our AIR supply... OR maintaining evapotranspiration and wind patterns and rainfall patterns... Its way more simple.

 WE must transition from "manthink" or machothink to "girlthink or GREENTHINK ... scientists have had this masculist way of thinking that they are always right. They think that years in a uni gives you the right to tell everyone else what to do.

The truth is there are no hard and set rules to it. I simply interviewed people one on one and compared what they said to what actually happened.

 I visited Brazil in 2020- 30 years after the scientists in Manaus were telling me : " O - the Amazon forest has shrunk by 25 % - this was in 1992... and it provides 33 % of all the Earths oxyegn supply and helps wind and rain all over the world... 

so we must stop cutting down trees..stop using cows... I in fact suggested an OXYGEN tax and wrote a book I never published because the manuscript was stolen. 

Called - Universal Concepts. In this book I spoke exactly about this question and coined the term ENVIRONOMICS. - Strangely enough .. Prince Charles visited the same place... I am not saying they were entirely worng...but they were alarmist.

So what is the truth now? Well... first of all ALGAE on the oceans provides 50 % or more of our oxygen supply and the Amazon is probably only responsible for 20 to 25% maximum of our oxygen supply. 

The river I am told accounts for 25% of our fresh water supply... Brazil has also the highest production of ETHANOL which is used in combustion engines as a replacement to OIL... it is grown. Grown from MAIZE... 

 "The most common ethanol production processes today use yeast to ferment the starch and sugars in corn, sugar cane, and sugar beets. Corn is the main feedstock for fuel ethanol in the United States because of its abundance and relatively low price historically. The starch in corn kernels is fermented into sugar, which is then fermented into alcohol." 

 Brazil and the USA provide 85% of the worlds ethanol ... and in Brazil IT IS AROUND 40- -50% LOWER cost than OIL due to taxations. However...it still remains a MIT- to HIT ...

 it is NOT a sustainable crop and produces GHGs. So this gets us back to the crux of the future once again... we need a STRONG solution ... 

a low impact solution ... a low impact technology...that will :

 1. SAVE OUR SOIL.

2. SAVE OUR ATMOSPHERE THROUGH CARBON REMOVAL. 

 3. SAVE HUMANITY FROM AI AND LARGE CORPORATIONS. ( Loss of employement) 

4. SAVE OUR RAINFALL.

 5. SAVE OUR WIND PATTERNS. 

 6. SAVE OUR TIME. -BE COST EFFECTIVE,SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND AND SAFE .

Theres so much time easting bad science out there that has discreditted the environmentalist movement time and again. Much of it directed by lobbyists. 

So we have learned a lot in the last 40 years. Quite a lot in fact. We have learned firstly that INPA was largely but not completely ...wrong... However, I have seen the reduction of the rain forest due to deforestration... 

YES... I have also witnessed the DRIEST summer in the PANTANAL and I have witnessed an ELECTRICAL FIRE STORM from the AMAZON. Caused by giant dust clouds and desertifications methods..eg mass burning of trees. 

 There is not doubt that we have to transition into this GREENTHINKING way... Also... we cannot trust some scientists like DR. SAVOURY who have been proven consistently wrong. We need to be MORE INCLUSIVE and OPEN up our economies on a GLOCAL ( global and local ) scale... and once again... think about creating NEW LOW IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES to REPLACE old HIGH IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES like whale blubber - replaced in 1896... and now fossil fuels... the problem is now we have a need to go 1000x TO MEET THE ENERGY NEEDS of humanity in the next 50 years. 

 And that will only happen with NUCLEAR FUSION... OR FISSION... and possibly GEO THERMAL AND HYDRO ELECTRIC...and SOLAR. But OIL AND COAL AND GAS AND METHANE... 

they have to go. YES... despite all of our efforts to screw up this planet... the current percentage of CO2 is only 0.04 % of the entirety... so CARL SAGAN was ...also WRONG... he said 90 times ... the current CO2 - in 1985... and im using 2022 figures to prove how wrong he was... - 

but ill get back to this in a moment. Carl Sagan was a good speaker and he was on the money ... 90 % of the time. But his figures didnt add up. Venus has 90 % - 96% CO2 - thats why its so hot at 400 Celcius or more.

 Great fine. But the truth is ... you multiply 0.04 % the current percentage of C02 on Earth... by 90 times... and you get only 3.6% ... so he was wrong. 

 Methane now and nitous oxide and other GHGS are equally as dangerous. We actually NEED a certain level of CO2 in our atmosphere like water vapour and others ..because it warms us up...without it... we would freeze..and the temperatures would be 30 degrees less. so make no mistake... CO2 is good..plants need it..they use photsynthesis to exchange CO2 for oxygen... and thats what we breathe. But ... TOO MUCH BURNING DOWN of forests... TOO MUCH HIT and SHIT... teks... and we produce an IMBALANCE in our ecology. 

 The Earth logically should therefore in the next 50 years move away from these high impact teks like they stopped whaling ..and by 2050 should entirely depend on CLEAN teks... OR LIT to sustain us... 

 And by this I also mean CASH. Why? - Because when you create DIGITAL CASH the carbon footprint and in fact TECHNOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT or TF is LOWER.

 No printing machines... no paper... no having to dig up gold from the ground... SO the EARTH right now has a challenge ... it must TRANSITION... but transition in a way that is smart. ENLIGHTENED. and CAREFUL.

Do not believe everything scientists say..even Carl "Simulation" Sagan...Dr.Allen" UN"- Savoury... Sir David" blooming" Attenbourough and Profesor BRIAN - "smarmy" COX... even "little angry girl "GRETA.

 They have ALL been wrong...at some point.  ..

- alarmist... and misguided!-

 TRUST THEN..WHAT YOU SEE. FEEL. EXPERIENCE FIRST HAND AND REALISE.

 In fact ..dont even believe me !.. an enviromental advocate for over 36 years... because I can get it wrong too. ( I really believed these guys like they were telling the gospel truth) 

- Only God knows how it all will go down... but there is no doubt we need to go LOW IMPACT TO SURVIVE... and Africa HAS MILLIONS OF EMPTY HECTARES AVAILABLE... 

-and lots of willing hands to grow our way out of this mess. ... I try to observe what I see, and record it over a 30 year period... for example.. the Dead Sea..

 I can categorically say to you... without doubt... the water level in the DEAD SEA has dropped by at least 30 metres... because ..Ive seen it...in fact theres a high water mark near Mezpe Dragot when the British were occupying Palestine 100 years ago...and the differnec ein water level ..was 100 metres....WOW..!!

 100 metres in 100 years... 

thats drastic. at this rate the Dead Sea will become a puddle by 2055. I can ALSO say to you that the coral in the RED SEA has been BLEACHED dramatically in the last 30 years... 

because I have seen it...that means the ALGAE that uses the coral symbiotically ...has died and thus there has been a REDUCTION of oxygen in the last 30 years as a result...

 and its happening all over the world..the majority of algae grows on coral... we also get oxygen from planckton ... but what we are doing has other impacts on our ecology too... fishing..tourism... shelter... weather patterns..etc... 

 And I have seen far flung places over the years changing... from India..to the COngo... to Europe to the Americas..jsut like the other guys... but I also get my info first hand from other trabellers ... rainbow warriors... all over the world... and we are not bound by any special agendas... 

at least most of us... our gatherings in the cathedral of nature are FREE. Nothing we do we get paid for...we are simply GUARDIANS or STEWARDS of the planet... But yes... we have 50 years to get it right.. 

or less... probably less than 20. If we dont start now by creating these NEW INDUSTRIES... and solving these technological issues... humanity will go extinct..because we wont have breathable air... 

or drinkable water... anymore... Right now ....forget Mars... even the MOON... there is NO PLAN B. The soonest we will get the moon inhabitable is around 2060 and Mars by the end of the century. 

If we last that long. But human consciousenss can and will survive her eon Planet Earth IF we change the economic systemn dramatically towards LIT and ENVIRONOMICS... 

it needs to be happen in the next 30 years...and it will accelerate positively if we spread the word now. It must work right here..and to do this we have to reverse the wheel ... create a NEW ECONOMY... 

based on the environment and the 8 algorithms of ethical sustainibility... and start NEW LOW IMPACT AND SUPER LOW IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES... For example... HEMP. - ALGAE and FUNGI. 

Those 3 organisms have the potential to become whole industries worth billions and billions of dollars... carbon removal alone is worth 20 trillion dollars... IF you are interested in this..contact me on earthoceans.org or hempxe.com - we can do better together! Never mind about waste reduction and 3D printing using fungi... 

 Hemp can make 50 000 products alone and sequestrate 4 times the amoutn of carbon that trees do...and turning vegetarian can reduce methane and fresh water consumption and output by at least 10 % ... 

 Its not hard to sustain life on planet Earth.

But we must immediately change the economic system. The grace period is over. 

 Its time for Low impact technologies- L.I.T. to replace high imapact technologies- H.I.T. ... we have less than 20 years to do so. 

Lets start with the removal of..."SUPER HIGH IMPACT TECHNOLOGIES "...or " - S.H.I.T."

And lets this move towards saving the planet we call the NEW EARTH ECONOMY.- N.E.E. or more accurately New Earth Order... ( NEO) . If we dont do something about it and stay ahead of the curve we will be controlled by the machines and end up as HOMOGENOUS slaves.

 ( THE NEW WORLD ORDER - NWO) GO PLANET ! LET IT GROW! LET IS FLOW!

GROW HEMP NOW!

AWOOSHA! Get rewilded !

PS By the way... despite what anyone thinks about Prince Charles... he actually does know a lot about the environment - something that was instilled in him at an early age by Sir Laurens V.D. Post in South Africa. 

He not only visited INPA but other important places like the Sighisoara forest in Transylvania. It is just a shame that he has based his philosophy on depopualting the Earth. Something that is not science based at all. 

Our planet if managed well can sustain over 18 billion people. We currently have 8. (Next time we talk about S.L.I.T. vs S.H.I.T. lol)

A poem for the batterypods of the future machine world.

  Dreamless Sleep

( for the botpeople) 

 Wandering into night, drifting into deep, deep, dreamless sleep

 Day after day; deep calling unto deep …deep dreamless sleep.

 Hypnotic awakenings, shambolic shakings of sleep, sleep, sleep

 I call again and again, evermore again, for deep dreamless sleep.

 Inside my cell, my tomb, my bubble, my womb, my keep 

I lose myself in dumbing, draining, deadening, dreamless sleep.

 Wishing for death, wishing for tears to weep, weep, weep

 I travel through time and space in wasted dreamless, soulless sleep. 

 Mindless matrix machinations, counting the sheep, sheep, sheep

 Never dead, never alive, never awake, never asleep. 

 This is my life : Listening to the walls coming closer – creep- creep-creep, 

Eternity unfolds; I am here but cold, longing for deep dreamless sleep. 

 A Ghazal for the mindless future sheep living  without humanity. 2010